Re: [saml-dev] Proposed Agenda Items for Tuesday's call - 5/7/2002

[Don Bowen <don.bowen@sun.com>]

One item I meant to include and just forgot is:

6. Discuss internet testing, who may participate and how

Don;

P.S. Sorry about my message times. I changed my time instead of
my time zone. :-)

Don Bowen wrote:

> Here are some proposed agenda items for our call on Tuesday.
> Because I'm in France I may not be able to call in (I hope
> this can be changed).
>
> 1. Clarify all actions related to finalizing technical focus
>
> As Hal and I both have said in recent emails, we must start
> making final decisions on what will be tested and by who.
> This needs to be at a sufficient enough detail so that there
> are no doubts. I have a small fear that we might include too
> much, as Prateek warned in the beginning. However, I have a
> bigger fear that we won't include enough or that we will
> "agree" to include something, but because of the lack of
> detailed communication about what that means someone will be
> left out. We absolutely must avoid either of these
> scenarios. Personally I believe that browser profile is not
> enough, but discussions on other aspects have not been
> sufficient. I'm not even sure the browser profile details
> are sufficient. This is our highest priority.
>
> 2. Review dry-run configuration details as proposed by
> Robert Philpott from RSA
>
> There has just been too little of this thread for me to feel
> good, but I don't think it should take much to have
> something we can go with for both east and west coast
> dry-runs.
>
> 3. Review which companies will attend and where
>
> This information is in the spreadsheet I've been
> maintaining, but won't hurt to review
>
> 4. Check status on marketing progress
>
> I don't know that anything is going on in this area and that
> has to change quickly. I will talk to our marketing person
> this week, but we almost need a marketing point person. They
> don't have to know everything, just take responsibility to
> make sure discussions are taking place and sufficient
> progress is occurring to insure success for that element. If
> we fail here, we fail :-)
>
> 5. Review status on each vendor's SAML development
>
> Not a big deal, but we should just insure that dates in the
> spreadsheet and associated capabilities are still valid.
>
> There are probably other points some of you can add. This
> will take most of our time.
>
> Regards from Paris :-) in case I can't participate.
>
> Don;

Attachment: don.bowen.vcf
Description: Card for Don Bowen