RE: [sca-assembly] CD 01 revision 1 available and status of issueresolutions

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

I've been busy correcting the JIRA system
- notes inline below.

I've also tackled the question of the
resolution to Issue 14....


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>

01/07/2008 19:18

To	"'Anish Karmarkar'" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "'OASIS Assembly'" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [sca-assembly] CD 01 revision 1 available and status of issue resolutions

I just went through the JIRA logs and the email archive for minutes and
here's what I
found.


> 
> 14: done only as it applies to the component property. The resolution
> was only for component property, but this should apply to composite
> property, component type property (what about 
> constrainingType property?)

<mje>
Well, here is a matter
of interpretation.  I can't actually see any place in the resolution
of Issue 14 that says
it applies only to component
property:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200804/msg00070.html

I must admit that I expected
that the way of declaring property values that is found in this resolution
would apply to any place
where a property value can be declared - and that would mean it applies
to <property/> in
<componentType/> and also <property/> in <composite/>.
 Of course in those
cases the <property/>
element has to also declare the type and whether multiple values are
permitted.

If other folk don't agree
with my interpretation, then I'll be happy to raise another issue which
will
simply call for the application
of the resolution of Issue 14 to <property/> in composites and in
componentTypes.

</mje>

> 
> 17: JIRA not updated with the resolution, so don't know what to apply

Resolution to 17 is recorded in the minutes of 19th February. Jira needs
to be
updated.

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200802/msg000
93.html

<mje>JIRA is updated
and also contains a link to the actual resolution text</mje>

> 
> 18: depends on 12, 12 is closed but don't see it being 
> applied. Also the 
> problem as stated in 18 doesn't exist.

Issue 18 was resolved on the 5th Feb 08 call.

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200802/msg000
46.html

Has this reolution been folded in, thus making it look like the problem
didn't exist?

<mje>Issue 18 resolution
depends on the resolution of Issue 12 - Issue 12 must be applied first...</mje>

As for 12, the JIRA change history has Scott recording it as resolved and
closed on
the same day, and the minutes record the approved motion to "Close
and Resolve...."

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/26042/SCA%20Ass
embly%20minutes%202007-11-06.html#d1e445

I believe this was before we became more precise in the usage of the terms
resolve and
close, and thus I believe closing it is a mistake. Therefore it suggest
we correct it
back to resolved and let the editors apply the change.

<mje>Issue 12 was
incorrectly marked as "Closed" - I have changed this to "Resolved"
- please apply
the resolution for this
one BEFORE 18 </mje>

> 
> 22: is this a dup of 35? 35 is closed by does not have the 
> resolution in 
> JIRA.

<mje>Issue 22 does
not appear to be a duplicate of Issue 35.  The resolution for Issue
22 addresses
specific lines in the spec
that are not dealt with by Issue 35.  Please apply the changes as
described in
the resolution for Issue
22 here:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200802/msg00056.html


</mje>

35 was resolved on the 8th Jan 08 call:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200801/msg000
18.html
Jira should be updated with this link to recored the decision.

<mje>JIRA for Issue
35 updated with a pointer to the minutes above</mje>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU