[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sca-assembly] CD 01 revision 1 available and status of issue resolutions
I just went through the JIRA logs and the email archive for minutes and here's what I found. > > 14: done only as it applies to the component property. The resolution > was only for component property, but this should apply to composite > property, component type property (what about > constrainingType property?) > > 17: JIRA not updated with the resolution, so don't know what to apply Resolution to 17 is recorded in the minutes of 19th February. Jira needs to be updated. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200802/msg000 93.html > > 18: depends on 12, 12 is closed but don't see it being > applied. Also the > problem as stated in 18 doesn't exist. Issue 18 was resolved on the 5th Feb 08 call. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200802/msg000 46.html Has this reolution been folded in, thus making it look like the problem didn't exist? As for 12, the JIRA change history has Scott recording it as resolved and closed on the same day, and the minutes record the approved motion to "Close and Resolve...." http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/26042/SCA%20Ass embly%20minutes%202007-11-06.html#d1e445 I believe this was before we became more precise in the usage of the terms resolve and close, and thus I believe closing it is a mistake. Therefore it suggest we correct it back to resolved and let the editors apply the change. > > 22: is this a dup of 35? 35 is closed by does not have the > resolution in > JIRA. 35 was resolved on the 8th Jan 08 call: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/email/archives/200801/msg000 18.html Jira should be updated with this link to recored the decision.