Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified

[ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>]

 > "CD-01-Rev3" sounds a reasonable name.

Didn't we decide that there shouldn't be a dash between CD and the number.
So, perhaps CD01-Rev3

All the best, Ashok


Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Anish,
>
> I can put your mind at rest - I am not asking for a CD vote.
>
> "CD-01-Rev3" sounds a reasonable name.
>
> Given that we have now resolved a load of issues, I think it is worth 
> thinking ahead to the
> next CD - but I would expect all those resolved issues to get 
> incorporated first.  I do want
> to make sure that the incorporation of those issues is done based on 
> top of this conformance
> version of the spec - just so that we don't have to go through this 
> exercise all over again!
>
> Yours,  Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
> Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
>
>
> From: 	Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
> To: 	Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> Cc: 	sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
> Date: 	04/11/2008 07:31
> Subject: 	Re: [sca-assembly] Groups - SCA Assembly Con Call modified
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>  > 5. Conformance & Test
> >
> > Adopt the Conformance version of the specification as the next
> working draft:
> >
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/29791/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2%20Conformance-05.pdf
> >
>
>
> Did you mean this to be a working draft or CD or CD revision? After the
> 1st CD we don't have any WDs. We have CD revisions and CDs.
> I suspect you just want the TC to agree and informally accept what is in
> this draft, perhaps make this a CD01-revX.
> I know I'm being pedantic here, but I want to make sure that you are not
> asking for a CD vote.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com wrote:
> > SCA Assembly Con Call has been modified by Dr. Mike Edwards
> >
> > Date:  Tuesday, 04 November 2008
> > Time:  07:30am - 09:00am PT
> >
> > Event Description:
> > Regular weekly TC teleconference
> >
> > Chat room:
> >
> > http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/sca-assembly-TC
> >
> > E-Meeting (may be useful for common viewing of documents)
> >
> > 
> https://www.mymeetings.com/emeet/join/index.jsp?customHeader=mymeetings&netId=SY83203&netPass=inglenook&netType=conference&acceptTerms=on&; 
> <https://www.mymeetings.com/emeet/join/index.jsp?customHeader=mymeetings&netId=SY83203&netPass=inglenook&netType=conference&acceptTerms=on&;> 
>
> >
> > Dial-in:
> >
>
> <snip/>
>
> >
> > PARTICIPANT PASSCODE: 338256
> >
> > Agenda:
> > 1. Opening
> >
> > Introductions
> > Roll call
> > Scribe confirmation
> > Agenda bashing
> >
> > 2. Approval of minutes of SCA-Assembly TC meeting of 21st October
> > 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/29899/SCA%20Assembly%20minutes%202008-10-28.html
> >
> > 3. Action Items:
> >
> > id=2008-06-03-6 status=pending Test sub cttee produce test 
> assertions and test artifacts and test harness
> > id=2008-08-26-2 status=pending Editors to re-consider the 
> application of the resolution to assembly-57
> > id=2008-09-16-1 status=pending owner="Editors" Add text to justify 
> no operator overloading as described in DaveB's E-mail
> >
> > id=2008-10-30-1 status=pending Vorthmann to examine the 
> specification and create text that implements the directional 
> resolution to Assembly-37
> > id=2008-10-30-3 status=pending Karmaker to develop concrete text 
> consistent with the directional resolution to Assembly-36
> > id=2008-10-30-4 status=pending Editors to fix pseudoschemas a/r to 
> be consistent with the resolution that resolves Assembly-32
> > id=2008-10-30-5 status=pending Vorthman to create a proposal 
> relative to potential solution for issue 5
> > id=2008-10-30-6 status=pending Koenig do the detailed work to 
> implement the resolution to Assembly-60
> > id=2008-10-30-8 status=pending Freund to draft a conformance statement
> >
> > 4. TC Administrivia
> >
> > Reminder that next week's call on Nov 11th is cancelled
> >
> > 5. Conformance & Test
> >
> > Adopt the Conformance version of the specification as the next 
> working draft:
> > 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/29791/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01-rev2%20Conformance-05.pdf
> >
> > 6. New Issues
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-88 Possible duplicate functionality offered by 
> constrainingType and component
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-88
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-89 Need for a Callback annotation for WSDL interface files
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-89
> >
> > Question for Debate concerning Component @name attribute  
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200810/msg00058.html
> >
> >
> > 7. Existing Issues
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-37 Need to clarify contents of an SCA Domain virtual composite
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-37
> >
> > Direction agreed at Oct F2F - waiting writeup
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-33: Long-Running Request-Response Operations
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-33
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-34: Define error handling
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-34
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-46: Dynamic Aspects of the Domain not adequately described 
> in the Assembly Specification
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-46
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-5: component type allows to specify wire targets on references
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-5
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-86: Abstract CRUD APIs for definitions infoset
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-86
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-87: A single definitions infoset is not sufficient
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-87
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-80: Create an Event Processing Model for SCA
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-80
> >
> > ASSEMBLY-2: use of UML 2.0
> > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-2
> >
> >
> > 7. Issue Status
> > 9 Open Issues
> > x opened
> > x resolved
> >
> > 8. AOB
> >
> >
> > Minutes:
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with 
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
> 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>