[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sca-assembly] REOPEN ISSUES 132 and 149: Update to Sanjay'sProposal
As mentioned on today’s call, we’ll need to ask the assistance of Mary and perhaps other members of the OASIS staff about this topic, but I do not see how these templates would need to be elevated to formal OASIS Specification status because unlike the SCA Assembly Model specification, which truly is an OASIS spec as it contains “specification” language, these proposed documents contain requirements language (in the form of templates) that are intended to assist the user community with verifying an SCA Runtime’s conformance with a SCA Assembly Model specification.
Looking over the various OASIS document templates (http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/), I do not see on in place for such a technical work product.
Raising these documents to full Specification level will most certainly impede our progress on ratifying the SCA Assembly Model v1.1 spec and I hope that is not the case, but we certainly need to find out sooner rather than later.
Would you like me to reach out to Mary and the OASIS staff about this or would you and/or Martin as TC co-chairs prefer to initiative the question? Just let me know.
- Jeff E.
stated otherwise above: