Minutes
<jeff.mischkinsky>
(Autoreply) sleeping -- zzzzzzzzz - dreaming of IM's
EricW:
Bob sends regrets - so I'm filling in
Opening
Roll call: 20/21 = 95% - Quorate
MikeE:
Have started separating 1.1 and 1.2 issues for clarity
topic; Approval of Minute
Resolution: Minutes of 20100420 accepted w/o
Action Items
ai: id=2010-03-02-3 status=pending owner="MikeE" Improve test Suite SPI to address other issues raised by JimM
TC Administrivia
Pulic review ended on 4th March 2010
New Issues
MikeE:
Describes issue regarding wire formst
Motion: m=MikeE s=EricJ Open ASSEMBLY-228
Resolution: ASSEMBLY-228 opened w/o
MikeE:
S/B easy to resolve - describes proposal in JIRA
Motion: m=MikeE s=DaveB Resolve ASSEMBLY-228 with poposal in JIRA
Resolution: Resolve ASSEMBLY-228 with poposal in JIRA w/o
<Mike Edwards>
Links to the issues:
MartinC:
Summarizes topics of ASSEMBLY-132 & ASSEMBLY-149
...originaly public comments
JeffE:
Reviews motive and revision to Sanjay's original proposal
Attached to proposal to reopen
<Sanjay>
Thanks to the authors of the 'implementation type documentation requirements' and the 'test suite adaptation specification'.
I think my original proposal was more of an outline and these documents make the proposal solid and worthy.
JeffE:
SCA Assembly MODEL is becomming std reference model for lots of work in NASA/academia
...would be extremely useful to embrace many domain specific languages - not just the SCA implementation specs
MartinC:
Would probably be best to separate langauge from bindings issues
...maybe reopen 132 as language and 149 as binding
MikeE:
Points out original proposal has documents attached that seems to have been overlooked.
Test Suite Adaption document:
Implementation Type document
JeffM:
Clarification on "Publically available"
...i.e. how much can I charge for these docs and could I require an NDA to to be able to view/use them?
...OASIS cannot require anyone to make anything available/public
EricJ:
What if a conformant SCA is deployed in a non-conformant manner?
...I.E. they use a different implementation language
...why do we care if the deployed SCA is conformant or not?
EricJ:
Also - why can't OASIS require public availability for the document(s)
MartinC:
Notes there is no current proposal
MikeE:
May be better to vote on reopening before spending tto much time
DannyV:
Individual customer could ask vendor to comply with spec - doesn't require CSA involvement
...groups of customers could agree on what is required - CSA could provide framework for "self policing"
MikeE:
Would be great if we could get all languages std at OASIS, but realistically need to include in some way those are not std
EricJ:
No objection to opening against 1.2, but too much work and delay for 1.1
MartinC:
If reopened would be against 1.1 - if against 1.2 open a new issue
EricW:
Also note that these were Public Comments on 1.1
JeffE:
SCA Assembly model needs to be std as soon as possible
JeffM:
Wary that unless done very carefully will allow a vendor to claim to be a std while only having proprietary implementations
...think we shouldn't reopen for 1.1 but can consider for 1.2
Motion: m=JeffM s=AnishK Reopen ASSEMBLY-132 and ASSEMBLY-149 against 1.1 spec
Sanjay:
Issue keeps coming up and seems to be a real requirement for some
...but what is the risk if vendors only support their own implementations?
MikeE:
This proposal "levels the ground" and would require all implementation types to conform in the same manner
<Sanjay>
keeping the door open for composition of proprietary implementation types with other proprietary or standardized implementation
types would be in important customer requirement.
...vendor may or may not charge for test suite etc - but is required to provide proof
<Sanjay>
allowing vendors to claim sca conformance with proprietary implementation types gives an opportunity and confidence to customers
and other vendors to build the needed composition tools
JeffE:
If this is too much work for 1.1 then ALL impelmentation dependent terminology for 1.2
MikeE:
Not sure if thei would require a public review - would need to consult OASIS staff
MartinC:
Time has expired
<jeff.mischkinsky>
this is new functionality, how could it not require a pub review - and if it is not a formal spec then i think it is clearly
the wrong thing to do
Martin can you please post the roll to the chat?
AOB
None - no stragglers heard
Meeting adjorned 9:02AM PDT
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
final validation: Date not specified, the date '2010-04-27' was assumed
final validation: Title not specified, default title 'OASIS SCA-Assembly TC...' was assumed
final validation: Chair not specified, default chair was assumed
statistics: Schreiber found 84 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 23: s/scrobes/scribes/
edits: Line 33: s/ASSEMBLY-19/ASSEMBLY-149/
edits: Line 104: s/Time expires/Time has expired/
command-scribe: Line 3: Since the line number is less than or equal to 20 we will interpret this as a scribename command,
note that the scribe command is deprecated
command-scribe: Line 3: Scribe 'Eric Wells' is recognized by use of the nick 'EricW'
command-scribe: Line 3: EricW's nick 'EricW' has been selected
citation-detection-scribed: Line 6: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Roll call'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 15: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'One public review comment received'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 17: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'ASSEMBLY-228'
edit-substitute: command on line 23 succeeded, changed line 21 from 'scrobes' to 'scribes'
edit-delete: Line 23 was deleted
citation-detection-scribed: Line 26: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Proposal to Reopen Issues 132 & 149'
edit-substitute: command on line 33 succeeded, changed line 29 from 'ASSEMBLY-19' to 'ASSEMBLY-149'
edit-delete: Line 33 was deleted
citation-detection-scribed: Line 45: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Test Suite Adaption document'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 46: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'View Document Details'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 47: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Download Document'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 50: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'View Document Details'
edit-substitute: command on line 104 succeeded, changed line 101 from 'Time expires' to 'Time has expired'
edit-delete: Line 104 was deleted
citation-detection-scribed: Line 107: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Meeting adjorned 9'
command-autoroll/oasis: Line 108: Attempting to fetch roll from http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/event.php?event_id=25376&day=1272362400
command-autoroll/oasis: Line 108: Successfully fetched roll from http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/event.php?event_id=25376&day=1272362400
system: Transformer: SAXON 9.2.0.6
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]