[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sca-assembly] Issue 238 proposal v2
It's open source so go fix it :-) > This is *not* a reflection on ODF, but on application implementation. I > haven't found any other ODF implementation to be better as of yet. While the > latest releases of OO are vastly improved, they still have a ways to go. > > Regards, > > Mary > > > On Nov 19, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote: > > > On 11/19/2010 8:55 AM, Eric Johnson wrote: > >> Hi Mike, > >> > >> On 11/19/10 1:59 AM, Mike Edwards wrote: > >>> > >>> *One thing to consider seriously for the 1.2 version of the specs is > >>> whether to do a* > >>> *complete migration to OpenOffice from Word format. I note that most > >>> of the newer* > >>> *spec documents are in OO format.* > >>> > >>> *The time to make such a significant change is at the point where we > >>> rebase 1.2 on* > >>> *the final 1.1 spec.* > >>> > >>> *I'd appreciate knowing everyone's view on this. I personally find OO > >>> easier to handle* > >>> *today than Word, but I realize that may not be the general view.* > >> > >> +1. > >> > >> As I move between Mac, Windows and Linux, OpenOffice has the extreme > >> advantage of being consistent across platforms. > >> > >> I'm sure folks from Oracle will object to switching to it, though ;-) . > >> > > > > Usually, I have to wait for my corporate overlords to let me know what > position they would like me to espouse, before I comment. But in this case > I'll go out on a limb here, deep down in the salt mines: > > > > If/when we do this, we'll have to consistently use OOo, as there are > sometimes suble differences in how OOo and Word (with the plugin) displays > the doc (at least it did in the past). I'm fine with a switch as I'm > comfortable editing with either tool. It'll involve some editorial work in > getting a few things right (for example the normative statement color > highlighting). I would also want to check that the HTML generated from OOo > is not too different from the generated PDF -- perhaps the OASIS folks have > already verified this. In the past (and things have improved significantly > since the 2.0 release), the HTML generation was not acceptable. > > > > Summary: I'm fine with the switch, if OOo can generate decent HTML. > > > > -Anish > > -- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]