[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Agenda - question on action item
|
First, my apologies for missing last week's meeting. I had a telecommunications crisis that took longer than hoped to resolve. As to the agenda below, specifically with respect to ASSEMBLY-235, the email referenced is more than just "latest discussion", it is a specific proposal for resolving the issue. On action items, comments inline below: On 1/10/11 5:36 AM, mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com wrote: 20110110133654.16751.qmail@eos.oasis-open.org" type="cite">I've not done much on this in a few weeks (partly due to holidays). I'm a little puzzled on the best way to move this forward, because each proposal I've floated seems to run into strenuous objection, even when the proposal I try to spell out actually comes from someone else (for example, injected channels). The injected channels approach seems closest to fitting the requirements that I originally floated, in that it allows for late-binding the choice of channel (global or not) that will be used.Agenda: 1. Intro Roll call Scribe confirmation Agenda bashing 2. Approval of minutes of previous SCA-Assembly TC meeting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/40683/SCA%20Assembly%20minutes%202011-01-04.html 3. Action Items id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending owner="EricJ" produce new proposal for ASSEMBLY-227 Fundamentally, we seem to have come to some agreement about information must be visible in the componentType. We just can't seem to agree on the syntax. Am I mis-characterizing the current status? 20110110133654.16751.qmail@eos.oasis-open.org" type="cite">id=2011-01-04-1 status=pending Johnson in absentia to create a proposal for the resolution of Assembly-239 This one I'm confused on. When we discussed this a few weeks back, we apparently agreed on the 2nd half of the proposal as stated in JIRA. We just couldn't agree on the first half. So I gained an action item to come up with an alternate proposal, and I did. Based on the paucity of minutes recording the discussion of this issue during last week's meeting, I'm at a loss as to understand either the concerns about the conclusion in that email, or why the email itself was unclear in its intent. At best, all I can figure out right now, is to restate a slightly revised proposal to resolve ASSEMBLY-239: Change the name of the body.xpath1 element to xpath1BodyFilter. Change the description of the Context Node to: "The root element of the event business data." If I have the time, and someone lets me know, I can do more than that, but right now I have no clue what is expected other than the above. -Eric. 20110110133654.16751.qmail@eos.oasis-open.org" type="cite">id=2011-01-04-2 status=pending Edwards to write a new proposal for the resolution of Assembly-246 along the lines contained in wsra 4. TC Administrivia None 5. Open Issues (1.1) None 6 Vote to make new Working Draft of the Assembly V1.1 spec the next CSD (CSD07) http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/40705/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-wd062.doc http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/40704/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-wd062.pdf This will also require a new Public Review if approved since the normative requirements have changed. 7. New Issues (1.2) None 8. 1.2 Specification Open Issues (1.2) ASSEMBLY-250: Need an equivalent to "autowire" for the eventing world http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-250 Proposal in JIRA ASSEMBLY-227: Promotion of consumers and producers undermines composability http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-227 Proposal http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201004/msg00044.html http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/37273/sca-assembly-1.2-spec-wd01-issue-227.pdf http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/37272/sca-assembly-1.2-spec-wd01-issue-227.doc Latest discussions: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00023.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00022.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00021.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00020.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00019.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00017.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00016.html ASSEMBLY-235: Remotable interface compatibility should not be restricted to a WSDL 1.1 mapping http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-235 Latest discussion: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00030.html ASSEMBLY-239: (1.2): Business data filter element needs better name, definition http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-239 Latest discussion: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00033.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/201012/msg00035.html ASSEMBLY-233: Define how Policy works for SCA Eventing http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-233 No Proposal ASSEMBLY-243: Is the default channel configurable? http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-243 No proposal ASSEMBLY-244: How to enable extensibility to multiple bindings on a channel http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-244 Outline proposal in JIRA ASSEMBLY-245: Adopt the WS-RA Event Description specification to declare SCA Event Types http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-245 Proposal in JIRA ASSEMBLY-246: Provide Location within SCA Contributions for eventType Declarations http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-246 Proposal in JIRA ASSEMBLY-247: What are the requirements on an SCA Binding for eventing purposes? http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-247 No proposal ASSEMBLY-248: RFC2119 wording and conformance statement need to be added for event processing http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-248 No proposal 8. AOB Minutes: This event is one in a list of recurring events. Other event dates in this series: Tuesday, 05 October 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 12 October 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 19 October 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 26 October 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 02 November 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 09 November 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 16 November 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 23 November 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 30 November 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 07 December 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 14 December 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 21 December 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 28 December 2010, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 04 January 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 18 January 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 25 January 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 01 February 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 08 February 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 15 February 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 22 February 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 01 March 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 08 March 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 15 March 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 22 March 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT Tuesday, 29 March 2011, 08:00am to 09:00am PT View event details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/event.php?event_id=28490 PLEASE NOTE: If the above link does not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. Referenced Items Date Name Type ---- ---- ---- 2010-12-22 SCA Assembly minutes 2010-12-21.htmlDocument--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]