Minutes
Opening
Roll Call 13/19 = 68% Quorate
Agenda - agreed as posted
Approval of minutes from 2011-02-01
Resolution: Minutes of 2011-02-01 approved w/o
Action Items
<Mike Edwards>
2 additional action items:
Action: id=2011-02-01-1 status=done owner="EricJ" Create proposal for ASSEMBLY-239
Action: id=2011-02-01-2 status=done owner="PeterN" Create proposal for ASSEMBLY-239
<Mike Edwards>
both of these are now complete, based on emails sent to the list
Action: id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending owner="EricJ" produce new proposal for ASSEMBLY-227
Action: id=2011-01-04-2 status=pending Edwards to write a new proposal for the resolution of Assembly-246 along the lines contained
in wsra
TC Administrivia
MikeE:
Still no action form OASIS Admin - will need to chase
...Does JAVA TC name issues affect CSD07?
AnishK:
Shouldn't affect Assembly spec
BryanA:
More impact on 1.2 not 1.1
New Issues (1.2)
...Problem if reference to GDC is within composite
PeterN:
Related to autocreate - if refering to non-existant GDC in composite
MikeE:
Intention is to allow composite to be provided as an "opaque" item
PeterN:
Same issue could arrise WRT external services & references
AnishK:
But content of package is visible to SCA even if external artifact is unknown
...also depends on how composite is deployed - if at domain level then apparent local channel can be domain channel
...I don't support distinction between global & local channels
EricJ:
Purposely didn't introduce issue WRT service & references - wanted to keep issues separate
<anish>
we don't have similar restriction on reference promotion -- we can't say that the promoted reference must be wired to a service
within the SCA domain (as opposed to an external service with a binding)
EricJ:
Provide clarification between service & reference and GDC situations
Motion: Open ASSEMBLY-255 m=EricJ s=None
motion fails due to lack of second
Motion: Close ASSEMBLY-255 with no action m=AnishK s=MikeK
EricJ:
Understand desire to move forward but how should issue be handled?
MikeE:
Feature is sort of thing handled by tooling
...also runtime deployment checks
...hence don't really need to specify in SCA Assembly model
AnishK:
Don't think it helps assembler - they still need to understand what is required for deployment
...has to create channels and figure out what's connected whether local or global channel
EricJ:
Speaks against motion
Vote: For 5, Against 3, Abstain 1 - motion suceeds
Resolution: Close ASSEMBLY-255 with no action - by vote 5 to 3
<anish>
i remember there was discussion on this in OSOA, can't remember why we ended up with "//". In fact we had something different
before
EricJ:
Don't like syntax of "//"
AnishK:
Was changed from OSOA, but can't remember why
PeterN:
Not really RFC compliant anyway
...not used anywhere else
EricJ:
"//" also implies hierarchy (that doesn't exist)
Motion: Open ASSEMBLY-256 m=EricJ s=AnishK
No further discussion no objections
Resolution: Open ASSEMBLY-256 w/o
Consideration of proposed solution - just use single "/"
AnsihK: How does this affect default channel?
MikeE:
"/<blank>" no different from "//<blank>"?
AnishK:
SCA allow all sorts of URI scheme's including hierarchical
...I.E. do we need to explicitly name default channel?
MikeE:
Suggest raising new issue if considered to be a problem
Motion: Resolve ASSEMBLY-256 with proposal in JIRA m=EricJ s=BryanA
No discussion - no objection
Resolution: Resolve ASSEMBLY-256 with proposal in JIRA w/o
Open Issues (1.2)
PeterN:
Reviews his solution (msg00039)
MikeE:
Out of time today - will add this as first item for discussion during next meeting
AOB
Straggler roll - GilbertP SanjayP
<Mike Edwards>
Thank you for scribing, Eric
<Mike Edwards>
roll is now up to date
EricW:
I can add the link later if needed
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
final validation: Date not specified, the date '2011-02-08' was assumed
final validation: Title not specified, default title 'Oasis SCA-Assembly Teleconference...' was assumed
final validation: Chair not specified, default chair was assumed
statistics: Schreiber found 81 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 15: s/id=2010-09-22-8 status=done/id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending/
edits: Line 95: s/Minute/minutes/
command-scribe: Line 2: Since the line number is less than or equal to 20 we will interpret this as a scribename command,
note that the scribe command is deprecated
command-scribe: Line 2: Scribe 'Eric Wells' is recognized by use of the nick 'EricW'
command-scribe: Line 2: EricW's nick 'EricW' has been selected
edit-substitute: command on line 15 succeeded, changed line 14 from 'id=2010-09-22-8 status=done' to 'id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending'
edit-delete: Line 15 was deleted
citation-detection-scribed: Line 63: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Vote'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 79: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'AnsihK'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 91: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'ASSEMBLY-239'
edit-substitute: command on line 95 succeeded, changed line 94 from 'Minute' to 'minutes'
edit-delete: Line 95 was deleted
citation-detection-scribed: Line 103: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'COB 9'
system: Transformer: SAXON 9.2.1.2
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]