Roll Call 13/19 = 68% Quorate
Agenda - agreed as posted
Approval of minutes from 2011-02-01
Resolution: Minutes of 2011-02-01 approved w/o
2 additional action items:
Action: id=2011-02-01-1 status=done owner="EricJ" Create proposal for ASSEMBLY-239
Action: id=2011-02-01-2 status=done owner="PeterN" Create proposal for ASSEMBLY-239
both of these are now complete, based on emails sent to the list
Action: id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending owner="EricJ" produce new proposal for ASSEMBLY-227
Action: id=2011-01-04-2 status=pending Edwards to write a new proposal for the resolution of Assembly-246 along the lines contained
Still no action form OASIS Admin - will need to chase
...Does JAVA TC name issues affect CSD07?
Shouldn't affect Assembly spec
More impact on 1.2 not 1.1
New Issues (1.2)
...Problem if reference to GDC is within composite
Related to autocreate - if refering to non-existant GDC in composite
Intention is to allow composite to be provided as an "opaque" item
Same issue could arrise WRT external services & references
But content of package is visible to SCA even if external artifact is unknown
...also depends on how composite is deployed - if at domain level then apparent local channel can be domain channel
...I don't support distinction between global & local channels
Purposely didn't introduce issue WRT service & references - wanted to keep issues separate
we don't have similar restriction on reference promotion -- we can't say that the promoted reference must be wired to a service
within the SCA domain (as opposed to an external service with a binding)
Provide clarification between service & reference and GDC situations
Motion: Open ASSEMBLY-255 m=EricJ s=None
motion fails due to lack of second
Motion: Close ASSEMBLY-255 with no action m=AnishK s=MikeK
Understand desire to move forward but how should issue be handled?
Feature is sort of thing handled by tooling
...also runtime deployment checks
...hence don't really need to specify in SCA Assembly model
Don't think it helps assembler - they still need to understand what is required for deployment
...has to create channels and figure out what's connected whether local or global channel
Speaks against motion
Vote: For 5, Against 3, Abstain 1 - motion suceeds
Resolution: Close ASSEMBLY-255 with no action - by vote 5 to 3
i remember there was discussion on this in OSOA, can't remember why we ended up with "//". In fact we had something different
Don't like syntax of "//"
Was changed from OSOA, but can't remember why
Not really RFC compliant anyway
...not used anywhere else
"//" also implies hierarchy (that doesn't exist)
Motion: Open ASSEMBLY-256 m=EricJ s=AnishK
No further discussion no objections
Resolution: Open ASSEMBLY-256 w/o
Consideration of proposed solution - just use single "/"
AnsihK: How does this affect default channel?
"/<blank>" no different from "//<blank>"?
SCA allow all sorts of URI scheme's including hierarchical
...I.E. do we need to explicitly name default channel?
Suggest raising new issue if considered to be a problem
Motion: Resolve ASSEMBLY-256 with proposal in JIRA m=EricJ s=BryanA
No discussion - no objection
Resolution: Resolve ASSEMBLY-256 with proposal in JIRA w/o
Open Issues (1.2)
Reviews his solution (msg00039)
Out of time today - will add this as first item for discussion during next meeting
Straggler roll - GilbertP SanjayP
Thank you for scribing, Eric
roll is now up to date
I can add the link later if needed
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
final validation: Date not specified, the date '2011-02-08' was assumed
final validation: Title not specified, default title 'Oasis SCA-Assembly Teleconference...' was assumed
final validation: Chair not specified, default chair was assumed
statistics: Schreiber found 81 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 15: s/id=2010-09-22-8 status=done/id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending/
edits: Line 95: s/Minute/minutes/
command-scribe: Line 2: Since the line number is less than or equal to 20 we will interpret this as a scribename command,
note that the scribe command is deprecated
command-scribe: Line 2: Scribe 'Eric Wells' is recognized by use of the nick 'EricW'
command-scribe: Line 2: EricW's nick 'EricW' has been selected
edit-substitute: command on line 15 succeeded, changed line 14 from 'id=2010-09-22-8 status=done' to 'id=2010-09-22-8 status=pending'
edit-delete: Line 15 was deleted
citation-detection-scribed: Line 63: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Vote'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 79: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'AnsihK'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 91: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'ASSEMBLY-239'
edit-substitute: command on line 95 succeeded, changed line 94 from 'Minute' to 'minutes'
edit-delete: Line 95 was deleted
citation-detection-scribed: Line 103: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'COB 9'
system: Transformer: SAXON 22.214.171.124
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]