Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 25: Does binding.ws imply SOAP
Following all of Mike's points....|
Mike Edwards wrote:
OF7DB247AC.5E0734B7-ON8025745C.002AC06B-8025745C.002B3C55@uk.ibm.com" type="cite">I believe we require supporting binding.ws with nothing additional supported, as in:
Coupled with Mike's statement above, this implies that a conforming implementation MUST support SOAP, even if SOAP is not used in a particular configuration.
Is that the question or is the question more specifically that it is always true that a binding.ws implementation "alwaysProvides" "soap"?
If you can't tell, I'm slightly lost as to the actual issue.