RE: [sca-bpel] Issue 14: we forgot intents

["Michael Rowley" <mrowley@bea.com>]

Perhaps we should have a single @sca:requires attribute, which goes on
partnerLinks, whose contents are the same as the contents of a service
or reference @requires attribute.  The semantic of the attribute would
be that it is translated directly into a @requires attribute on the
service or reference that is generated for the partnerLink.

How does that sound?

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:06 PM
To: OASIS BPEL
Subject: [sca-bpel] Issue 14: we forgot intents

We resolved issue 14 on today's call, but right after the call ended I 
realized that we did not define an extension for specifying intends in 
the BPEL process. In a previous call we had informally agreed that 
specifying intends in the process made sense. Issue 14 is not just about

services and references but about everything that can be specified in 
the process.

-Anish
--

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php