OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 14: we forgot intents

Title: [sca-bpel] Issue 14: we forgot intents

Michael Rowley wrote:
2E22E42D2E71B845B67F093A02B962DB02229EEF@repbex01.amer.bea.com" type="cite">


I think schemaTron rules are a good idea, but I think they are not specific to issue 14.  I think we should have a new issue for it.




From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 12:44 PM
To: Anish Karmarkar
Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] Issue 14: we forgot intents


Agreed.  I had to drop off the call during the discussion, but from the minutes, it seems we also ignored (intentionally or unintentionally) my thoughts about Schematron.  Is there any interest in the committee for using Schematron to give a little more rigor to where items can be put, and in what combination?

Anish Karmarkar wrote:

We resolved issue 14 on today's call, but right after the call ended I
realized that we did not define an extension for specifying intends in
the BPEL process. In a previous call we had informally agreed that
specifying intends in the process made sense. Issue 14 is not just about
services and references but about everything that can be specified in
the process.


To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]