Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/>and <operationSelection/> - proposal v3

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Seems like a good way to resolve this.

One question I do have is: do we still want to allow this (as an 
extension point) or disallow it in this binding?

-Anish
--

David Booz wrote:
> If we agree to go this route, the EJB binding spec might look different 
> than the current proposal. I would throw away the current proposal and 
> simply add a new section before the Appendix, like this:
> 
> 7 Wire Format and Operation Selectors
> 
> The SCA Assembly Model Specification [ASSEMBLY] defines extensibility 
> points for bindings to specify <wireFormat/> and <operationSelector/> 
> configuration. This specification does not define any wire format or 
> operation selector extension elements.
> 
> 
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
> 
> Inactive hide details for Mike Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:09 
> AM---Folks, I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elementMike 
> Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:09 AM---Folks, I wonder why we need a 
> description of these 2 elements in this binding,
> 
> 
> From:	
> Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
> 
> To:	
> "OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> Date:	
> 06/11/2009 02:53 AM
> 
> Subject:	
> Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for <wireFormat/> 
> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I wonder why we need a description of these 2 elements in this binding, 
> given that it does not actually support them.
> 
> I note that the issue has been raised in Assembly to make the elements 
> abstract, so that in reality only specific extended
> forms of these elements can be used anywhere - and this spec states that 
> it does not support any of them.
> 
> 
> Yours, Mike.
> 
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
> 
> From: 	David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
> To: 	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
> Date: 	10/06/2009 15:22
> Subject: 	[sca-j] ISSUE 118: EJB Binding: Need description for 
> <wireFormat/> and <operationSelection/> - proposal v2
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> There was a small editorial change to this proposal noted in the 
> telecon. I am reposting v2 of the proposal just for that change. I 
> believe we are blocked on this issue until Anish raises the binding 
> issue to address wireFormat and OperationSelector in the pseudo schema 
> of the WS binding spec./
> 
> (See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc)/
> 
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com[attachment 
> "sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue118_v2.doc" deleted by Mike 
> Edwards/UK/IBM] 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:_
> __https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php_ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /
> /
> 
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/
> 
> 
> 
> 
>