[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [search-ws-comment] SRU/CQL: clarification about fatal diagnostics
Hello Ray, Am 14.06.2012 16:40, schrieb Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress: > For the SRU case, see section 11 (of SRU 2.0) "Diagnostics". There are > surrogate and non-surrogate diagnostics, and there are fatal and non-fatal > diagnostics. But a fatal diagnostic (which is what we're talking about) is > always non-surrogate. Yes, I'm aware of surrogate and non-surrogate diagnostics. > Surrogate diagnostics go in <records>, non-surrogate in <diagnostics>, thus > fatal diagnostics go in <diagnostics>. Maybe the section in the spec could be a little improved, by extending the example in the specification and indicate the other XML elements, so people don't get the wrong impression to just return the <diagnostics> elements. (And additionally maybe indicate that, if the endpoint can know the operation, it can wrap it in the appropriate response element). " Non-surrogate, fatal diagnostic: <explainResponse xmlns="..."> <version>1.1</version> <record> ... </record> <diagnostics> <diagnostic xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/diagnostic/"> <uri>info:srw/diagnostic/1/38</uri> <details>10</details> <message>Too many boolean operators, the maximum is 10. Please try a less complex query.</message> </diagnostic> </diagnostics> </explainResponse> " Thank you and best regards, Oliver -- Oliver Schonefeld Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Zentrale Forschung R5, 6-13, D-68161 Mannheim +49-(0)621-1581-451 | http://www.ids-mannheim.de
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]