OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

search-ws message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [search-ws] Search WS TC Document Available


That's fine, I'm just trying to learn the process, and I thought there may
be some requirement for me to upload the document if I'm asking people to
review it. Apparently not, and  I'm happy to keep it here for now.
Thanks. --Ray


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
To: "'Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress'" <rden@loc.gov>; "'James Bryce
Clark'" <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
Cc: <search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 6:26 PM
Subject: RE: [search-ws] Search WS TC Document Available


> Hi Ray,
>
>   While I have created the OASIS group, the TC is not officially "formed"
until we have a successful launch and the TC
> cannot conduct any business before that time. As soon as we get through
the formalities of the first meeting we can get
> the document uploaded; in the meantime I think it's best that it remain on
an external server.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mary
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 5:34 PM
> > To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [search-ws] Search WS TC Document Available
> >
> > I have created a strawman draft document,
> > http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis-sru.pdf .
> >
> > It is based on the SRU version 1.2 specifications at
> > http://www.loc.gov:8081/standards/sru which are proposed as
> > input to the TC.
> >
> > I would like to spend some time during the call on the 18th
> > walking through the specifications, both the web site and
> > this document.  Not a technical walkthrough, rather, more of
> > an "organizational" walkthrough.  As the SRU specs are
> > currently spread across dozens of web pages, some
> > (prospectively) normative and others non-normative,  we want
> > to begin thinking about how they can best be consolidated
> > into a single document - what's normative and what isn't,
> > what is the logical order for the various components of the spec.
> >
> > I don't suggest we spend an inordinate amount of time on this
> > during the first meeting, but I do think this merits 30
> > minutes (or more if time permits).
> >
> > (I would be glad to "upload" the document to OASIS if I could
> > figure out
> > how.)
> >
> > --Ray Denenberg
> >
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]