[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [search-ws] Scan: another approach
But, we're not going to go to that radical step, are we? Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:14 PM To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [search-ws] Scan: another approach From: "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> >Sorry, but startRecord and position are not the same thing. They're not, if you insist on maintaining the existing Scan semantics. > They look the same when you keep using the value 1, but when do a scan asking for ten terms with my term in the 5th position, My point is that you don't need to have separate sematical units for what position the anchor is and where you want to start. If you always assume the anchor is in position 1 you get the same functionality. If we are going to go the radical route of combining the operations there really isn't a need to retain this aspect of semantic compatibility, is there? --Ray --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]