[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: allIndexes, anywhere, anyIndexes, and serverChoice
We had discussion at the last call about the these
indexes - -
allIndexes, anywhere, anyIndexes, and serverChoice. There was confusion and I said I'd look into it. I've figured out what's going on. In the CQL contexts set version 1.2
http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/resources/cql-context-set-v1-2.html allIndexes says: "alias:anywhere" anywhere is not defined separately, and allIndexes was not defined in
version 1.1
So the intent was to *rename* "anywhere" as "allIndexes". The
aliasing was for historical purposes.
Same situation for anyIndexes and serverChoice.
The intent was to rename serverChoice as anyIndexes.
Suggestions:
1. Adopt the first change as intended and replace "anywhere" with "allIndexes". 2. We could also define "anywhere" separately, so that it includes
non-indexed content. Opinions?
3. Choose between serverChoice and anyIndexes and
strike any reference to the other. I'm happy retaining serverChoice and striking
anyIndexes, but either would be fine.
--Ray
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]