RE: [search-ws] queryn: Some further comments

["LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>]

> That's where we were when we were still debating the usefulness of the
> queryN parameter. I believe we now agree on it's usefulness, and so I
> suggest that the presence of queryN signals this alternative way of
passing
> query information, and therefore there a new query type isn't needed.

Where would you use the queryN parameter except for the cql-form
queryType?  This is not a first-class SRU parameter.  It is a queryType
specific parameter.

Ralph