Re: [security-jc] SJC Resolutions

[Phil Griffin <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>]

Thanks Darran. And yes, you've described the numbering
scheme. I used the dates from your meeting minutes. I'd
like to have these reviewed, amended as necessary, then
approved before or during the next meeting. Then you
should link them up.

And Darran, thanks so much for all the work you do.

Phil


Darran Rolls wrote:

> In preparation I have tabulated this list in html and put the document
> on the committee site for review (not currently linked from the home
> page).
> 
> You can hit the URL for review in [1].  Phil let me know when you want
> it linked.
> 
> One thing, do I understand the numbering correctly?
> 
> 		020626-01 translates to:
> 		02 = year
> 		06 = month
> 		26 = day
> 		01 = serial number
> 
> [1]
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security-jc/Docs/resolutions.shtml
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
> Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com 
> (512) 657 8360                    
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Phil Griffin [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 1:24 PM
>>To: Security Joint Committee
>>Subject: [security-jc] SJC Resolutions
>>
>>I was reviewing the various SJC minutes recently,
>>and it struck me that we need a way to better provide
>>an institutional memory apart from the rather context
>>specific meeting minutes, and the ballots that occur
>>on line. It also lets us differentiate between member
>>action items and group resolutions.
>>
>>In ISO TC68/SC2, we maintain a file for this purpose
>>where we place resolutions that we agree and ballot
>>over time, meeting by meeting. I've taken the last
>>two on line ballots and mined the meeting minutes and
>>tried to construct such a document.
>>
>>This is attached for your review and comment. And I
>>hope to refine this work, agree to a revision, and
>>for the SJC to consider making this an ongoing feature
>>of our process. This item will be on the agenda for the
>>next meeting.
>>
>>Phil
>>
>