[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] Minutes for 7/17/2007 concall
I did answer to my name being called yesterday as a non voting member
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
"Anderson, Steve" ---07/17/2007 11:44:40 AM---Minutes taken by Jeff Bohren
From: | "Anderson, Steve" <Steve_Anderson@BMC.com> |
To: | <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org> |
Date: | 07/17/2007 11:44 AM |
Subject: | [security-services] Minutes for 7/17/2007 concall |
HL: we have a choice to produce both documents as one standard or two. Current default is two. We would need two ballots and two entries on the public page. If we want them treated as one standard we need to invent a name that combines both.
Rob: prefers combined into one.
BC: these two are geared at two different use cases. That would be the drawback to combining. That must be balanced with the problem of two specs.
ScottC: what do we do later if we combine these. How do we maintain these on an ongoing basis.
HL: If we combine them then when we modify one we have to approve the other.
ScottC: it may make more sense to keep them separate. These drafts have been around and use the old doc template.
HL: we should go ahead and apply the new template. Hal to contact Mary to ask about this. We are trying to get a package for the Aug 15th voting deadline.
AI - HL to contact Mary about document template.
BC: Consensus is to treat as two specs.
Rob: The TC homepage doesn't have a pointer to the errata document.
HL: the required conformance clause requires the RFC 2119 lang. Requires a separate section for one or more conformance options. Believes that there can be zero for non-normative documents. Should address how to normatively follow the spec. The SAML 2.0 Conformance language can serve as a model.
AI - HL to find language around the conformance statement.
BC: can non-normative documents have a null conformance clause.
HL: believe that is true.
AI - BC to ask Mary about the conformance clause.
HL: it may be that non-normative docs have to stop at CS.
BC: trying to summarize the status of these docs on the Wiki.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]