RE: [security-services] Re: How to list new standards?

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> It would be easier (for me) if
> the order were:
> 
> # Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v1.0
> # Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v1.1
> # Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v2.0
> 
> then:
> 
> Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v2.0
> SAML 2.0: Metadata Extension for SAML v2.0 and v1.x Query Requesters
> SAML 2.0: Metadata Profile for SAML v1.x
> Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v1.1
> Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) v1.0
> 
> hmm..........

Obviously we have a stake in de-emphasizing SAML 1.x, but given that we will
have better vehicles for publicizing these specs than just this one,
whatever is most "appealing" is fine to me.

-- Scott