[OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (SOAEERP-10) PR08-E2 WhitePaper-cd03 Section: *EERP Technology*

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19277#action_19277 ] 

Paul Yang  edited comment on SOAEERP-10 at 5/21/10 2:05 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/37833/EERP-Model-UseCase-WhitePaper-cd03-diff-wd08withLineNumber.pdf

bullet #3: "* In the second paragraph of SubSection: *Enablers for Optimization: ..."

  line 133:  change has been made

bullet #4: "Suggestion for next to last paragraph of SubSection: *Status of Standards Process..."

  line 189, change has been made 



      was (Author: paulyang):
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/37833/EERP-Model-UseCase-WhitePaper-cd03-diff-wd08withLineNumber.pdf

bullet #3: "* In the second paragraph of SubSection: *Enablers for Optimization: ..."

  line 133:  change has been made

bullet #4: "Suggestion for next to last paragraph of SubSection: *Status of Standards Process..."

 page 7, change has been made 


  
> PR08-E2  WhitePaper-cd03 Section: *EERP Technology* 
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOAEERP-10
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-10
>             Project: OASIS Service-Oriented Architecture End-to-End Resource Planning (SOA-EERP) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: PR Comments
>            Reporter: Paul Yang 
>            Assignee: Szu Chang 
>
>     * I would like to commend you on the explanation given in
>       SubSection: *Enablers for Optimization:*
>     * Specifically, I am very pleased that "The focus of the SOA-EERP
>       Technical Committee is on enablers for optimization and process
>       improvement rather than on the complete EERP environment." This
>       was an unspoken concern of mine early on, and it puts the entire
>       complement of specifications into a sound perspective. (Note: I
>       didn't intend to start with agreement and commendation. I must be
>       slipping!")
>     * In the second paragraph of SubSection: *Enablers for Optimization:
>       *the parenthetical phrase "(how to represent cost, time, and
>       cost)," is clumsy. Perhaps "(how to represent cost, time, and
>       intended result)," might be better. (Note: the term we use in the
>       SOA-RAF for intended "result" would be intended "Real World Effect.")
>     * Suggestion for next to last paragraph of SubSection: *Status of
>       Standards Process:* "These XML vocabulary specifications address
>       the exchange of information that models the business
>       characteristics of a service, permits assertions or queries
>       related to the credibility of the service and its provider, and
>       the establishment of agreements about the _*use of*_ business service. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira