[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (SOAEERP-29) PR07-T8 Whitepaperdoes not define an architecture for interaction

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19387#action_19387 ] 

William Cox commented on SOAEERP-29:
------------------------------------

This is the issue about whether a "rating service" is a specialization of a "business service" and how you tell the difference. This is both protocol document and the definitions of the responses.


> PR07-T8 Whitepaper does not define an architecture for interaction
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOAEERP-29
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-29
>             Project: OASIS Service-Oriented Architecture End-to-End Resource Planning (SOA-EERP) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: PR Comments
>            Reporter: Paul Yang 
>            Assignee: William Cox
>
> 9. The White paper does not carefully define a model or architecture for interaction; those aspects of EERP should be spelled out in the forthcoming protocol specification. Some may be better in these specifications, e.g., could it be stated that only a rating service returns a rating list? and only a business service (still undefined) returns credentials? 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira