[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (SOAEERP-29) PR07-T8 Whitepaperdoes not define an architecture for interaction

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19458#action_19458 ] 

Szu Chang  commented on SOAEERP-29:
-----------------------------------

WD09 @ http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/38426/EERP-Model-UseCase-WhitePaper-wd09-diff-cd03-withLineNumber.pdf 

Fig 1, Fig 2, Fig 3, Fig 7, and Message Flow (line 243-252) have been revised into what we have in the protocl spec. 

Rating service will be defined in the Protocol spec. 

Assign to Bill to see if any text should be added to the white paper. 

> PR07-T8 Whitepaper does not define an architecture for interaction
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOAEERP-29
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-29
>             Project: OASIS Service-Oriented Architecture End-to-End Resource Planning (SOA-EERP) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: PR Comments
>            Reporter: Paul Yang 
>            Assignee: William Cox
>
> 9. The White paper does not carefully define a model or architecture for interaction; those aspects of EERP should be spelled out in the forthcoming protocol specification. Some may be better in these specifications, e.g., could it be stated that only a rating service returns a rating list? and only a business service (still undefined) returns credentials? 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira