[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (SOAEERP-30) PR07-T9 The term"third party" in the Business Rating spec is problematic

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=19388#action_19388 ] 

William Cox commented on SOAEERP-30:
------------------------------------

Another way of asking this: Is there a conformance clause relating to what kind of service can respond to a rating request?  The term "third party" seems to still be ambiguous.

Szu says that the conformance clause has been addressed.  Either one of them - list of something?

The phrase "third party" has been removed in the rating spec.

> PR07-T9 The term "third party" in the Business Rating spec is problematic
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOAEERP-30
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/SOAEERP-30
>             Project: OASIS Service-Oriented Architecture End-to-End Resource Planning (SOA-EERP) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: PR Comments
>            Reporter: Paul Yang 
>            Assignee: Szu Chang 
>
> 10. The use of "third party" (e.g., in Rating lines 100) is problematic. Does the specification assert that only "third parties", which is taken to mean "parties unaffiliated with either the requester or the target of the rating request" will respond? The conformance clauses on this issue are extremely weak. This is another area where the overall architecture, in a normative form rather than a white paper, is essential to understanding. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira