Re: [soa-rm-ra] OO vs. SOA and what goes into a service

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Title: Re: [soa-rm-ra] OO vs. SOA and what goes into a service

In SOA, is it necessary that there is an object behind the service?  We talk to the interface (service)and don’t really care what is behind it.  Assuming there is an object could be errant and architecturally un-elegant.

Duane


On 1/22/08 3:05 PM, "Ken Laskey" <klaskey@mitre.org> wrote:

> Is it fair (or at least not too distorted) to say that with OO we define an object and look for what we can do to it (i.e. its methods) while with SOA we identify what we want to do (i.e. business functions) and then, if appropriate, look for objects to do it to?


-- 
**********************************************************************
"Speaking only for myself"
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html
**********************************************************************