Re: [soa-rm] Glossary

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Let's see what the editors suggest.  I am open to that but want to make 
sure it doesn't detract from our work.

D

Ken Laskey wrote:

> Duane,
>
> Could we also have a pedestrian version of the glossary where anyone 
> could put in a short thought or a link to a more detailed discourse?  
> That way, if someone had something they wanted to make sure didn't get 
> lost in the email traffic, they'd have a place to put it for others to 
> consider.  The pedestrian entries could be fairly rough because the 
> version maintained by the editing team would capture and clean up the 
> consensus.
>
> K