Re: [soa-rm] Modified Issues List

[Don Flinn <flinn@alum.mit.edu>]

Michael

Understand.  My thought was that any action taken without the explicit
approval/suggestion/direction of the TC was just a suggestion by the
editor/issuer.  I see your point in this TC, so I'll add another value.

Pending Action - Action taken by editor without explicit direction of
the TC.

Don

On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 11:06 -0400, Michael Stiefel wrote:
> The use of the term action seems ambiguous.
> 
> You have
> 
> Pending Review: Agreed action taken by editor & waiting review by TC
> Pending: Waiting for agreed action to be taken
> 
> which imply that the action referred to is the suggestion of the TC reviewer.
> 
> There is another action, the results of the TC discussion / vote which 
> might result in a different resolution. If the TC vote is just a 
> confirmation / rejection of the proposal, then the extra status is 
> redundant. Somehow, I doubt that will always, or frequently be the case, 
> especially for the early reviews.
> 
> Michael
> 
> At 10:54 AM 5/19/2005, Don Flinn wrote:
> >Michael
> >
> >I'm missing your point. Doesn't pending, pending review and closed cover
> >these cases?  Pending review is intended to mean that the responsible
> >party (editor or a TC member) is in the process of doing the agreed upon
> >action. Review means the action has been completed and is waiting review
> >by the TC.  I'd like to keep the status values to a minimum, but if we
> >need another one, no problem.
> >
> >Don
> >
> >On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:06 -0400, Michael Stiefel wrote:
> > > How about one more status value?
> > >
> > > Pending Action: TC has agreed on action, awaiting completion.
> > >
> > > Depending on the volume of suggestions, and the ability of the editors to
> > > make revisions, it might be worthwhile for the TC to see what issues it 
> > has
> > > actually disposed of (Closed, and Pending Action), and those that have
> > > actually been put into the draft document (Closed).
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > At 08:36 AM 5/19/2005, Don Flinn wrote:
> > > >As per the discussion at the 5/18/05 telecom, I have added the a Status
> > > >and a Proposed Disposition column to the issues list.  The headings now
> > > >read (No line breaks in the Excel sheet)
> > > >
> > > >ID      Status  Draft   Title   Submitter  Type Section
> > > >Lines   Original Text   Suggested text  Notes
> > > >Proposed Disposition    Disposition     Disposed in
> > > >
> > > >I'm not sure we need Section and Lines since these should be in the
> > > >description, if applicable.  I'll leave them there for now.
> > > >
> > > >The status column will have the following values.
> > > >
> > > >Status
> > > >- Closed: Action on issue taken and accepted
> > > >- Open: No action taken on issue
> > > >- Pending Review: Agreed action taken by editor &
> > > >     waiting review by TC
> > > >- Pending: Waiting for agreed action to be taken
> > > >- Withdrawn: Issue withdrawn by issuer
> > > >- Duplicate: Issue same as another issue (Example Dup of 07-1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Don
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Don Flinn
> > > >President, Flint Security LLC
> > > >Tel: 781-856-7230
> > > >Fax: 781-631-7693
> > > >e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
> > > >http://flintsecurity.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >--
> >Don Flinn
> >President, Flint Security LLC
> >Tel: 781-856-7230
> >Fax: 781-631-7693
> >e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
> >http://flintsecurity.com
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Don Flinn
President, Flint Security LLC
Tel: 781-856-7230
Fax: 781-631-7693
e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
http://flintsecurity.com