[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Laskey [mailto:klaskey@mitre.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:13 PM > To: Matthew MacKenzie; peter@justbrown.net > Cc: 'Duane Nickull'; 'SOA-RM' > Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls > > Whoa there, are members of the editing team eligible? Only after they've completed their writing. ;) Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Booz Allen Hamilton O: 703-902-6923 C: 202-251-0731 Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > I > thought there was an OASIS process rule that expressly... > > Ken > > At 04:03 PM 8/25/2005, Matthew MacKenzie wrote: > >Since Duane doesn't qualify: +1 > > > >Bring on the Cristal! > > > >Peter F Brown wrote: > > > >>I don't think TC chairs qualify for the prize. If you read the full > >>terms and conditions of the offer as published (but as yet not > >>discovered nor invoked by anyone - in fact, discoverability wasn't > >>actually built into the promotion offer service architecture) you > >>would have noticed that all office holders of the TC are > >>forbidden...blah blah > >> > >>Ah what the heck, let's just crack open the bubbly (again) when you > >>come over...The good stuff's cheaper over here anyway > >> > >>Peter > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] Sent: 25 > August 2005 > >>20:28 > >>To: peter@justbrown.net; SOA-RM > >>Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls > >> > >>+1 - champagne is mine!!! > >> > >>D > >> > >>Peter F Brown wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>I'd also suggest: > >>> > >>>- pre-meeting offer should be made to scribe (avoids that > embarrasing > >>>foot-shuffling that you can practically hear on call): > >>>first offer posted to the list, gets the job; No proposal: > last one > >>>to offer gets no dessert or has to invite whole TC to > dinner at next > >>>F2F; > >>>- tweaks to the minutes: send a mail to the scribe of the meeting > >>>concerned, copy to list; > >>>- on call: minutes of previous meeting(s) deemed approved without > >>>discussion or decision unless before end of meeting there is an > >>>objection (by mail or point of order); -reports from liaisons and > >>>editors in writing to list before meeting (at least the key points) > >>>- install webcam on Ken's car so that we can be sure he is > actually > >>>driving and keeping his eyes on the road... > >>>- a large dose of common sense: it's great to talk to > people on call > >>>that you haven't seen at all or in a while, and to keep > things a bit > >>>fun, but bear in mind that time is money (and outside the US and > >>>Canada, the call is costing a buck a minute at least - that's > >>>equivalent to my individual OASIS member fee in three > >>>meetings) and that some things really can be dealth with > off line... > >>>- keep the creative flow of the meeting going by allowing overtalk > >>>and interrupts where appropriate but also keep to the point: the > >>>"threads" on call can be worse than on the list: with the > quality of > >>>the line sometimes making this all the worse. Duane, you > may have to > >>>practice being a bit more ruthless while you're on > parental leave... > >>>;-) > >>> > >>>All the best, and a glass of champagne in Vienna to the > first on the > >>>list to give this a +1 ... > >>> > >>>-Peter > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] > >>>Sent: 25 August 2005 01:27 > >>>Cc: SOA-RM > >>>Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls > >>> > >>>Example: > >>> > >>>An unnecessarily long discussion on suggested alternative > dates (at > >>>least the portion that could be done prior to the meeting). A > >>>discussion over the OASIS rules and procedures etc. > >>> > >>>Both of these can probably be best done using the WIKI or > list server > >>>or at least a substantial portion thereof. > >>> > >>>Duane > >>> > >>>Chiusano Joseph wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Sounds good to me Duane. For clarification, can you provide an > >>>>example of what would be considered administrivia (beyond > taking roll call)? > >>>> > >>>>Joe > >>>> > >>>>Joseph Chiusano > >>>>Booz Allen Hamilton > >>>>O: 703-902-6923 > >>>>C: 202-251-0731 > >>>>Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] > >>>>>Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:16 PM > >>>>>To: SOA-RM > >>>>>Subject: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls > >>>>> > >>>>>TC: > >>>>> > >>>>>Matt said something that tweaked my thinking a bit today. > >>>>> > >>>>>I would like to try and keep the use of the conference calls > >>>>>largely for technical work and confine administrivia to > a minimum. > >>>>>Perhaps most of this can be done via the list. > >>>>> > >>>>>Accordingly, I would look to the editing team and others > to suggest > >>>>>topics that need to be discussed on the next calls. > >>>>> > >>>>>D. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------- > / Ken > Laskey > \ > | MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 | > | 7515 Colshire Drive fax: > 703-983-1379 | > \ McLean VA 22102-7508 > / > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------- > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]