[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next?
I will only be able to attend via call (wife having baby) but will definitely be back in time for next F2F in 2006. Duane -----Original Message----- From: Matt MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:45 AM To: Michael Stiefel; peter@justbrown.net; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next? I could do dec12-16, but I was hoping that we would get together as a TC in the Oct. timeframe with the aim of making 08 a committee draft. -matt -----Original Message----- From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:28 PM To: peter@justbrown.net; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next? First choice: I vote for December 12-16 in Vienna. Second choice: no F2F in 2005. Michael At 09:28 AM 9/14/2005, Peter F Brown wrote: >...both literally and figuratively. > >I have had 11 replies to my request for feedback, of which 8 indicated >that they would in principle be able to attend a F2F meeting in Europe >this Fall (plus 1 to join by confcall if available). Difficult to make >projections based on such a small sample, although I'm going on the >basis that those that reply are *more* likely to be the ones that would >actually consider attending... > >Most of those plumped for Vienna rather than London, but the numbers >suggest to me that we ought to pause before proceeding further. > >Recommendation to the TC >------------------------ >The options to put to the TC would be, in order, > >A. Abandon hope of holding a F2F again in 2005; B. Opt for Vienna, >12-16 or 16-19 December; C. Opt for Vienna, 14-17 October; D. Start >looking for somewhere else, preferably for December; > >I would propose: the first of the proposals above to get support from >10 members of the TC is the one we go with. If no proposal reaches that >threshold by the next confcall, option A will be the default choice. > >Sorry, but I can't see another simple and quick way of resolving this. > >Peter
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]