Re: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Title: Re: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM

I will share the results with his permission.

Duane


On 9/21/06 10:56 AM, "Laskey, Ken" <klaskey@mitre.org> wrote:

This list not only includes the kitchen sink but every dirty dish that was runored to be in it.  A quick look shows he still has WSDL 1.2 as current and there may be other aberrations, but keeping such a list up to date would be a full time job.  Talking about all of this in a reference model would have SOA-RM being an encyclopedia.

But I'll be interested if and how he responds to Duane's email.

Ken

---

From: Jeffrey A. Estefan [mailto:jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Thu 9/21/2006 1:51 PM
To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM

Duane,

Does it really matter if we get a couple of NO votes?  I'm not familiar with the OASIS requirements on whether formal spec adoption as an official OASIS Standard requires a unanimous YES vote or not.

Incidentally, the Momentum folks are the ones who stood up the following site:
http://www.serviceoriented.org/service_oriented_enterprise.html

If you look at the list of SOA-related terms/contents at this link:
http://www.serviceoriented.org/table_of_contents.html

you can see where Jeff S. may be coming from in terms of completeness.  I came across this material a couple of years ago.  Also note that Jeff S. is the CEO of Momentum.

Cheers...

- Jeff

-- 
******************************************************
Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.       *
Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee*
Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com                *
******************************************************