[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Post-conditions?
Reality/sanity check: Are post-conditions actually different enough in a TA from a 'Test Effect' to warrant their inclusion in the TA Model? The logic that the post-condition has to be true or the test is inconclusive seems now, in hindsight, a bit weak: if the post-condition has to be true then why isn't it a part of the test and therefore part of the Test Effect? If not part of the test, included in Test Effect then how does one know whether the test is inconclusive? It fits nicely with UML contracts but they have a different purpose - they use the post-condition as near enough (it seems to me) the same as what becomes a Test Effect. Personally I'd be happy with their removal since we have Test Effect -- Stephen Green Partner SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]