[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Prescription level - glossary entry
As discussed in last meeting, I propose adding a little to the prescription level entry in the glossary to cover distinct shades of meaning (e.g. RFC or ISO/IEC normative language distinctions): We have so far: "The test assertion defines a normative statement which may be mandatory (MUST/REQUIRED), permitted (MAY/OPTIONAL) or preferred (SHOULD/RECOMMENDED). This property can be termed the test assertion’s prescription level. NOTE: in the case of the normative source including keywords 'MUST NOT' the prescription level 'mandatory' is used and the 'NOT' included in the predicate." I propose to add: "There are differences between various conventions of normative language and the above terms may be extended with more specialized terms for a particular convention and its distinct shades of meaning." Anyone offer any alternatives? --- Stephen D Green
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]