[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] Re: TC Website reorganization, and drafts update
Bernard, Thanks for putting this together. I have a few comments about the Recommendations: For the new definition proposal for published subject we now have, "A published subject is any subject for which at least one subject definition document has been made available by an identified publisher." How about this instead if we need to be more explicit: "A published subject is any subject for which at least one subject definition document at a stable URI has been made available for public use by the publisher identified within the published subject documentation." This is only for clarification, but for the subject indicator definition, the sentence that Lars Marius recommended is in addition to the first sentence and does not replace it completely? "A subject indicator is a resource that is intended by the topic map author to provide a positive, unambiguous indication of the identity of the subject. A resource can become a subject indicator by being referred to as such by some topic in some topic map." For 3.2, in addition to the abbreviated list that Lars Marius proposed, can we also recommend to add dc:date with a comment that this is the date of publication? Is version information really needed or would this date suffice? Can we also add the acronyms in parenthesis to the published subject documentation (PSD) and the subject definition document (SDD) definitions? There are no acronyms used for the other definitions in ISO 13250, so this may not be good to have acronyms for some but not for others. I just wanted to put this on the table to be thought about. It would be nice to have at least one example of the PSD and the individual SDDs. Best regards, Mary At 07:49 PM 1/12/02 +0100, Bernard Vatant wrote: >Lars Marius > >I've added your remarks along the draft where they belong >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/recommendations/psdoc.htm > >I've added section 3 title which had been cut by mistake ... oops >"Recommendations for Published Subject Documentation" > >No special comment on my behalf for the moment, most of your remarks I >basically >agree upon at first sight. >Will think about it over the week-end ... "Devil is in the details" (Sam >Hunting) > >Other comments welcome and will be added the same way. > >I keep version 0.1 without added remarks at >http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/recommendations/psdoc_01.ht >m > >Cheers > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC