OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

topicmaps-comment message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Fw: Fw: [xtm-wg] alternative to "real-world"


I forwarded Bernard's post on this topic to Mary Keeler. She is writing a
chapter for the XTM book regarding the philosophical underpinnings of
inquiry, particularly with respect to Topic Maps.  Here is her reply.

> Pass this on to whomever you see fit, Jack.
>
> I don't know that what I say will be of any help what-so-ever, but let me
> try to explain (too briefly) how Peirce addressed this (very old, very
> deep philosophical) problem.  BTW, I keep putting up philosophy, in this
> context, because the whole point of philosophy is to excavate, analyze,
> and further investigate what most of us merely assume and get carried away
> with.  Most folks just like to do that; philosophers don't.  So don't bear
> with me if you just want to sail on somewhere.
>
> Peirce's philosophy tries to solve the problem of _what is real_,
> pragmatically.  That is, by suggesting as a reasonable hypothesis that we
> might consider reality to be any perceived or conceived _regularity_ or
> resistance in our experience.  The only problem, then, would be to find
> out whether that perceived or conceived regularity corresponds to
> something existent or not, eventually.  I say "eventually," because we all
> know that representation procreates until its regularities (in languages
> as such) "take on a life of their own" and drive our thoughts within their
> prescribed structures of permissible representation.  (We come to think
> what and how they let us think, if we don't remain aware of their power to
> constrain our thoughts).  Reality, then, as only what we _think and say_
> it is, can become ridiculously authoritarian and hopelessly relative to
> human fancies.  So Peirce says we must always think of _existence_ as the
> hypothetical _unknown_ (not the _unknowable_, as Kant conceived it).
> That is, the concept of existence should keep us humble and honest about
> what we think we know is real, but also give hope to press on in learning
> more, because we realize that there is always more to know.
>
> Here's what he says in an unpublished manuscript I've been working on.
>
> By real, I always mean that which is such as it is whatever you or I or
> any generation of men may opine or otherwise think that it is.  There must
> not be any confusion between reality and existential,--that is real which
> is as it is no matter what one may think about it, the existential is that
> which is as it is whatever one may think about anything.  No doubt there
> are grades of reality, meaning that objects of signs may yield with more
> or less resistance to opinion or representation.  According to the
> definition absolute resistance is essential to reality.  But an approach
> to reality, something that is not in the slightest of the nature of a
> pretense is found wherever an object of thought is sufficiently obstinate
> to enable us to say, it has not those characters but it does have these,
> there is already a lesson in logic.  Namely, that one may lay down the
> very best of definitions, going to the very heart of things; and yet there
> will be, as it were, a little living mouse of a quasi exception which will
> find or make a hole to get in when all seemed hermetically closed.  This
> mouse will not be a mere pest to be got rid of and forgotten.  It will be
> a fellow being to be remembered and to be appraised. [MS 498: 32-33]
>
> Now, how can that perspective be helpful to you all?  I'm still working on
> that explanation and must get back to it.  --MK



============================================================================
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may
contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not
the intended recipient, dissemination of this communication is prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies
of the message and its attachments and notify postmaster@verticalnet.com
immediately.
============================================================================


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/337252/_/981568370/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC