Re: [xtm-wg] An XTM test suite

[Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net>]

Steve,

At 22:12 17/02/01 -0600, Steven R. Newcomb wrote:
>BTW, I'm voting "Yes" on XTM 1.0, although I have grave
>misgivings about Annex F, which I find misleading --
>not so much by what it says, but by what it doesn't
>say.

I think we all realise that there is much more to be said,
that's why the processing subgroup was set up at the last
meeting. All the same, I feel that Annex F contains an
extremely useful "starter set" of requirements that covers
a lot of the most important interoperability issues. That,
to me, is the justification for including it in 1.0.

Steve

P.S. Thanks for the vote :-)

--
Steve Pepper, Chief Technology Officer <pepper@ontopia.net>
Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3  Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps)
Ontopia AS, Maridalsveien 99B, N-0461 Oslo, Norway.
http://www.ontopia.net/  phone: +47-22805465  GSM: +47-90827246


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/337252/_/982603819/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com