Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Nikita Ogievetsky
| 
| Lars, you keep asking this question.
| I guess my answers so far where not satisfactory.

Not to me, at least.

| ASR and PM will be used by potentially different people.
| 
| Implementors will need to know ASR 
| Experts who create ASR will need to know PM

Who are these experts, and what is it the PM gives them that the ASR
and the CM does not? You're giving me little hints, but by no means
enough for me to have any idea whether I think you make sense or not.
Please remember that I have no idea what you're thinking and that
these things are pretty subtle and tend to require lots of
explanations.

| ASR-s can be different for different software implementations,
| that is why I was suggesting the notion of "Universal ASR" 

I've been using ASR as a shorthand for UASR all the time. The only
people who specify ASRs will be vendors and developers, I think.
Well, and maybe the TM API spec.

| which needs a separate specification, may be "infoset-like".

The UASR? Agreed.
 
--Lars M.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security?
Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your
Web Site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2cW4jC/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/