Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Luis J. Martinez
| 
| I know it needs to be worked on, but I was hoping that it was the kind
| of model you were looking for. 

It is. It is very close to my infoset-based strawman, so the two of us
are definitely on the same page. The only thing I am uncertain of is
whether UML is the formalism to use.

| The object model should expand all the convenience features in the
| syntax and point out the derivations from the conceptual model. Ones
| everything is explicit in an object model, then we can move into
| processing.

I agree completely.

| I think we first need to agree in what xtm processing is before a
| canonical form can be useful.

I agree, but nobody even bothered to say so. I had to do it as quickly
as I did because Ontopia needed it internally for testing purposes,
and we had to test now.

--Lars M.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/