[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: PM and CM (Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements)
Sam says: > P.S. This also presumes that the CM is stable. Daniel says he "hopes" > it is, but... I think the CM is as stable as any part of the spec ... There have as yet been no errata identified in the concpetual model, to my knowledge, nor any major issues requiring consideration of formal revision to it. Any spec must be subject to review (that was the thrust of my earlier objection to the statement in the Core Deliverables document of 4 December that the DTD *would not change* in certain specified ways). However, the review that occurs after a spec has been formally approved is of a very different kind from the review that occurred during the development period. "To err is human - to forgive, divine", they say. I hope we can both err and forgive. To state that a spec will not change is I think a kind of hubris, implying either that one is certain there are no errors (which is a perverse kind of pride) or that any errors discovered will not be corrected (which is a perverse kind of folly). Having said that, we did all in our power to make the spec as solid as we could before formally approving it, and any revisions that may be proposed thereafter will need to be handled in a rigorous and careful way. In brief - Yes, the CM is stable. No, it is not eternal and immutable. But yes, it is absolutely part of the XTM structure, to and from which appropriate mappings should be made. Daniel -----Original Message----- From: Sam Hunting [mailto:sam_hunting@yahoo.com] Sent: 23 March 2001 17:30 To: xtm-wg@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: PM and CM (Re: [xtm-wg] Simplified requirements) Since the CM is itself in an informative annex, the mapping should be in an Informative Annex as well. S. P.S. This also presumes that the CM is stable. Daniel says he "hopes" it is, but... --- Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no> wrote: > > * Nikita Ogievetsky > | > | I would definitely add the following to the requirements: > | > | 8. A clear Mapping of PM to the Conceptual Model should be > provided. > > I forgot this, but I think Nikita is right. This should be in the PM. > > --Lars M. > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com > > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: > xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ===== <!-- "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life." - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations --> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption! Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now! http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> To Post a message, send it to: xtm-wg@eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC