Re: [xtm-wg] XTM Processing Model - alternative proposal

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Lars Marius Garshol
|
| This approach has been chosen in order to avoid the problem inherent
| in any formalism: that the formalism must first be learned.

* Sam Hunting
| 
| To me, this is like saying that XML would be easier to learn if
| there were no angle brackets.

Is this your only comment?

If so, it is no argument for the current graph models over this
property-based model, since the graph models have no more of a
formalism than does the strawman.
 
| Instead of "throwing the baby out with the bath water," wouldn't it
| be more appropriate to insist that any formalism be easy to learn
| and use?

Maybe. Such an insistence would look strange in the processing model,
however. 

--Lars M.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/