RE: [xtm-wg] core.xtm

["Eric Freese" <eric@isogen.com>]

> [Eric Freese]
> | 3) The current specification work undertaken by
> TopicMaps.org would revert
> | back to ISO.  As mentioned in a previous note, the XTM DTD will
> | be added to
> | 13250 as a normative annex.
>
> How about the normative work done by the AG other than the spec itself
> (e.g., as mentioned above, core.xtm etc.)? Is that considered "current
> specification work" as well, meaning it, too, would go back to ISO?

Only the DTD at this point goes to ISO.  The XTM spec itself would remain
with TopicMaps.Org (possibly published as an OASIS technical report?) as
would the language, country, core, etc.


To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/