[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [topicmaps-comment] RE: [sc34wg3] I need a map to follow thepostings!
From: Michel Biezunski > I think the policy should be that whatever is a subject of > general interest for the topic map community should go > to the general interest topic map mailing list, while the two > other lists, sc34 and topicmaps-comment should be devoted, > and exclusively used for, the work currently being done by > the corresponding committee(s). > [...] > Remember, the policy of the sc34 working group mailing list is > basically to discuss the resolutions, bring input to the standard > process. Everything else should not be posted to that list. I suppose > the same is true for the topicmaps-comment mailing list for OASIS. I don't think this set of policies will work for everyone in the TM community. For example, I only subscribe to the topicmaps-comment list and am not even aware of the sc34wg3 list before this episode. However, I think the reason for the current behavior is that many issues being discussed have implications on all apsects of TM (let alone RDF, DAML, etc.), and there is really not a clear-cut "layered" framework for the Topic Maps architecture. This is part of the reason for my earlier suggestion (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/topicmaps-comment/200109/msg00048.html). Regards, Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC