Re: [ubl-cmsc] Context Rule Syntax

["Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>]

This gets into hard design issues, and I don't feel prepared to give an 
opinion yet.

BTW, I do think that we have made the XSD decision -- at least the NDR 
group is working from that.

         Eve

At 04:23 PM 11/16/01 +0100, Matthew Gertner wrote:
>7) Syntax of the context rules in general. Assuming that we decide to use a
>canonical syntax language (probably XSD), should we align the names of the
>context tags so they match the tags in the schema language? Can we handle
>all of the various constructs (global types, local types, local elements,
>etc.) that are retained by the Naming and Design subcommittee? Are any of
>the constructs redundant (e.g. what is the different between "CreateElement"
>and an "Add" tag containing and "Element" tag)?

--
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com