[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-comment] Re: [oagis-users] Big News from OAGI
At 04:40 AM 12/9/2002, David Connelly (OAGI) wrote: >MEMBERSHIP: We celebrate the following new members in the Open >Applications Group: > >[.......]- Intuit >(<http://www.intuit.com/>http://www.intuit<http://www.intuit.com/>.com/) Does this imply that Intuit will in future, provide any standards-based interfaces? That would be an excellent development. I would regard that as an earthquake, and should set off a stampede by users as well as the IT and financial services industries, into the OAG. Excuse me however, if I am a bit skeptical. The small business community has for *many* years, needed open APIs or at least, document import/export from Intuit Quickbooks and Quicken, and has only recently begun to see a very expensive "developer network" empowering VARs, ISVs, etc. to make a living from their APIs. Market dynamics did not allow shrinkwrap vendors to publish efficient import/export for interoperability (general ledger) because that allowed users to migrate to other packages. That translates into higher prices for users. To this very day it remains impossible or uneconomically expensive, to migrate a Quickbooks company to any other software. Everybody knows, you just start over with Peachtree or whatever, on January 1 with an empty installation. Does the adoption of global standard like OAGIS overcome this well-known, long-established economic problem (that shrinkwrap cannot allow customers to export)? Does the "network effect" from participating in electronic markets, access to greater revenue, lower sales, etc overcome the loss of stickiness for the software vendor? Do these things compel a higher price from consumers? Does the improvement in integration? Until knowing the intention of Intuit I will remain quite puzzled by this Intuit membership. I must assume, they are studying standards-based interfaces for their midrange version, whereas, it is most needed by Individuals and SMEs in Quickbooks Basic, and in Quicken. Since they are a newcomer to the Midrange market they're singing a different tune. Newcomers always espouse open interfaces :-) An Intuit employee was announced as reaching voting membership in the OASIS UBL group March 26 by Jon Bosak but Intuit is no longer show in the membership and Intuit's participation or adoption of UBL is not evident anywhere I can see, http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/#members Intuit should port their software to BSD (which is, MAC OS/X). Intuit should implement an integrated RADIUS server, ebXML MS, or other standards-based transport, to provide a monolithic end-to-end alignment of ARs and APs between Quickbooks users. These measures would enable individuals and SMEs an independent capability to conduct business without portals. OAGIS semantics will be a good step, but don't really get us all the way home. That's like unlocking the prisoners from their cells while, the main gate is still locked. TOdd Todd Boyle CPA 9745-128th Ave NE Kirkland WA International Accounting Services, LLC www.gldialtone.com 425-827-3107 editor, AR/AP everywhere www.arapxml.net
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC