RE: [ubl-csc] Revised outcomes of coordination call 12 December 2003

["CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

Anne wrote:

> Currently, AFAIK, UBl 1.0 Beta supports CCTS 2.0.  But you note above
> that ccts 2.01 is quite stable.  So this already raises questions:
> When did it become stable?  Are we expected to move to 2.01?  Or
> have we already moved to 2.01?  If not, will we move to 2.01 for the
> final UBL release?  Is 2.01 available to the public now?  If 
> so, where?
> What were the changes?  What do we do if CCTS 2.02 comes along in the
> meantime, or there is 'one more small change' to CCTS 2.01 - what is
> the cutoff date for CCTS changes?

The ONLY difference betweeo 2.0 and 2.01 is the title and reintroduction of ebXML references.  I would have preferred issuing CCTS 2.0 Second Edition with a note that it was just errata, but was overrulled by Klaus for his usual political shenanigans.

Mark