Re: SV: [ubl-dev] Hybrid approach to local vs. global

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2007-03-02 12:54 +0100, Bryan  Rasmussen wrote:
> >>For example - if the Russian Government said - "we'd love to use UBL -
> >>but we need different tagnames for in country use" - then having the
> >>option to use CAM to morph between localization details and say an EU
> >>base-line - would obviously be enabling... and overall I'm guessing the
> >>bigger goal is UBL adoption and use, rather than say driving XSD
> >>adoption and use!?!
>
> >This isn't a new idea and my comments regarding not supporting this
> >have nothing to do with CAM.  ISO/IEC 19757-8 Document Schema
> >Renaming Language (DSRL) was also posited to address the use case of
> >a community of UBL users wanting to have "local" names for a
> >transliterated (not transformed) document vocabulary equivalent in
> >structure to UBL.  This has already been discussed.
>
>Is this part of the DSDL?

Yes, it is:  http://dsdl.org

Here is the FCD ballot document:

   http://www.jtc1sc34.org/repository/0792c.htm

. . . . . . . . Ken

--
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training
RSS feeds:     publicly-available developer resources and training
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/u/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal