Re: [ubl-lcsc] Reusable Types with IDs

[Michael Adcock <Michael.Adcock@apacs.org.uk>]

Apologies for slight delay..., e-mail problems...

I think one should bear in mind that an address, re-used in a
particular role or context, may not need the entire address recipe. For
example, we have a 'jursidiction address' and 'registration address'. At
the moment they are full addresses. I believe that a serious bit of
thought would strip the tax-related 'jurisdiction address' down to just
country and state..., not much more than that.

I think that adopting a principle of 'plug everything into a schema
once in generic form' principle conflicts with the concept of 'context'.
Either that or I am way-off-beam with my understanding of things!

Mike Adcock
Standards & Security Unit
APACS - Association for Payment Clearing Services
Mercury House, Triton Court
14 Finsbury Square
London EC2A 1LQ
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7711 6318
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7711 6299
e-mail: michael.adcock@apacs.org.uk


**********************************************************************
The opinions expressed are those of the individual and not the company.
  Internet communications are not secure and therefore APACS does not  
     accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee responsible for delivering this communication to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or
   copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
          telephone to arrange for its return.  Thank you.
**********************************************************************