[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: House and Building
BuildingName and BuildingNumber is fine with me! Best Regards Stig Korsgaard M.Sc.E Standardisation Coordinator Tel: +45 3370 1083 Cell: +45 2121 8234 Mail: stk@finansraadet.dk Danish Bankers Association Amaliegade 7 DK-1256 Copenhagen K Tel: 3370 1000 Fax: 3393 0260 mail@finansraadet.dk www.finansraadet.dk -----Original Message----- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: 4. juli 2003 04:12 To: ubl-LCSC@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: House and Building To facilitate debate and consensus on the reviewed items, I am posting relevant issues as discussion points. The intention is that after a one week period the team shall resolve these issues. For example, this issue will be resolved at the call on Friday July 11th. Item 1. The OAG reviewers have identified that the UBL use of Building and House in the Address structure is ambiguous and they are in fact, synonyms. Can anyone see why we should not have BuildingName and BuildingNumber? This also brings us closer to the CIQ vocabulary. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgrou p.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]