[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: House and Building
I believe that both are necessary, unless you want to combine them into one thing called BuildingNameOrNumber (I am not advocating this). ____________________ Alan Stitzer AVP Marsh USA Inc. 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-2774 Phone: (561) 743-1938 Fax: (561) 743-1993 Internet: Alan.Stitzer@marsh.com ____________________ <<< Memo from tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au@Internet on 03 July, 2003, 10:22:31 PM Thursday >>> tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au@Internet on 3 Jul 2003, 22:22 Thursday To: ubl-LCSC cc: (bcc: Alan Stitzer) Subject: [ubl-lcsc] [roe] OAG comment: House and Building To facilitate debate and consensus on the reviewed items, I am posting relevant issues as discussion points. The intention is that after a one week period the team shall resolve these issues. For example, this issue will be resolved at the call on Friday July 11th. Item 1. The OAG reviewers have identified that the UBL use of Building and House in the Address structure is ambiguous and they are in fact, synonyms. Can anyone see why we should not have BuildingName and BuildingNumber? This also brings us closer to the CIQ vocabulary. -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgroup.php To: ubl-LCSC@lists.oasis-open.org@Internet cc: (bcc: CN=Alan Stitzer/OU=NYC-NY/OU=US/OU=Marsh/O=MMC) From: tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au@Internet
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]