[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] more input
At 05:31 PM 11/8/01 -0600, Mike Rawlins wrote: >We talked through a lot of different user profiles (and corresponding >use cases) in the planning committee, and that is how we came up with >the ubiquitous "various and sundry". What we *didn't* do was assign >priorities. Hello, Eve? Is this something we want to take on ask a >task? I think that is what Kelly is concerned about... Sounds reasonable, although I despair of finding a truly *accurate* weighting of the various/sundry situations. What if each of the people on the SC submit a description of the situations they know of (either through personal experience or second-hand) regarding the handling and use of schemas, done as semi-formal use cases, and then we discuss and rank them in Wednesday's call? I think that doing this, along with approving our issue outline, will be a good accomplishment for the next meeting. Dave, if you have any UML-related words of wisdom about designing use cases, that would be welcome. Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC